Jackson v. Village of Maywood Police Department et al
最近更新时间：2025-06-26
案件信息
案件号：ilnd-1:2025-cv-00104
状态：open
提交时间：2025-05-21 00:00:00
诉讼类型：商标
律所：GBC
原告：Jackson v. Village of Maywood Police Department et al
| # | 日期 | 案件进程 |
| 19 | 2025-05-21 | E-MAILED and MAILED a copy of order 20, a blank amended complaint in civil rights case form, a blank summons form, and a blank USM-285 form to Plaintiff. |
| 18 | 2025-05-21 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: The letter filed by the U.S. Marshal Service in response to a revised USM-285 form submitted by self-represented Plaintiff Kimyuna Jackson for service of "Officer Octti" 19 indicates that he is now affiliated with the Bellwood Police Department and the USMS will require an amended complaint and revised summons to attempt service. In addition, it appears that Defendant's name may be spelled "Octii", not "Octti". Accordingly, by 6/10/25, Plaintiff is ordered to file an amended complaint reflecting Defendant's correct name and current employment, obtain a summons reflecting the same, and submit a revised USM-285 to the USMS with the amended complaint and summons. The previously set briefing schedule on Defendant Maywood Police Department's anticipated motion to dismiss 18 stands. The Clerk's office is directed, forthwith, to send Plaintiff a blank amended complaint in civil rights case form, a blank summons form, and a blank USM-285 form. Mailed notice |
| 17 | 2025-05-19 | LETTER from USMS (Received via pro se email on 5/19/2025) |
| 16 | 2025-04-28 | E-MAILED and MAILED a blank USM-285 form and a blank complaint in civil right case form to Plaintiff. |
| 15 | 2025-04-24 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Telephonic status hearing held. Individual Defendant Officer Octti did not appear. Counsel for Defendant Village of Maywood Police Department reported the individual defendant officer's name may be spelled incorrectly. Plaintiff's oral motion to extend time to serve Defendant Officer Octti is granted for good cause shown. Plaintiff must complete and submit a new USM-285 form to the Court for service upon the individual officer by 5/23/25. By agreement of the parties, briefing on Defendant Maywood Police Department's anticipated motion to dismiss will proceed as follows: Defendant's motion due by 6/17/25; Plaintiff's response due by 7/28/25; and Defendant's reply due by 8/11/25. No notice of presentment is required. The Court reminds Plaintiff that she is granted leave to file an amended complaint on or before the deadline to respond to the anticipated motion to dismiss. The Clerk's office is directed, forthwith, to email and mail Plaintiff a blank USM-285 form and a blank amended complaint in civil right case form. Mailed notice |
| 14 | 2025-04-18 | WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Village of Maywood Police Department. Village of Maywood Police Department waiver sent on 4/18/2025, answer due 6/17/2025. |
| 13 | 2025-04-18 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Village of Maywood Police Department by Lily C Mckay |
| 12 | 2025-04-18 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Village of Maywood Police Department by Anthony George Becknek |
| 11 | 2025-03-17 | E-MAILED and MAILED copy of order 14, USM 285 forms with instructions to Plaintiff. |
| 10 | 2025-03-17 | E-MAILED and MAILED copy of order [14], USM 285 forms with instructions to Plaintiff. |
| 9 | 2025-03-17 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Because it appears that the U.S. Marshal Service has not yet received USM-285 forms for Defendants and service is therefore outstanding, the telephonic status hearing previously set for 3/20/25 12 is stricken. The Clerk's office is directed, forthwith, to email and mail blank USM-285 forms to Plaintiff. By 3/28/25, Plaintiff must complete and return to the Court a USM-285 form for each defendant being served. Failure to complete and return the USM-285 forms may result in this case being dismissed for want of prosecution. Telephonic status hearing reset for 4/24/25 at 9:45AM. Attorneys/parties may appear by dialing: 1-650-479-3207 and entering access code: 2311 499 1046. No attendee code is required. Please review in advance the policies governing telephonic hearings that can be found on Judge Hunt's webpage on the court website. Mailed notice (gel,) |
| 8 | 2025-01-29 | SUMMONS Issued, certified copy of order dated 1/28/2025 to the U.S. Marshal's Office for service as to Defendants Officer Octti, Village of Maywood Police Department via email. |
| 7 | 2025-01-28 | COMPLAINT filed by Kimyuna K. Jackson (Received via Intake counter 1/6/24) |
| 6 | 2025-01-28 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Telephonic motion hearing held. Self-represented Plaintiff Kimyuna K. Jackson provided additional information concerning her application to proceed without prepaying fees or costs 10, which is granted. Having reviewed the affidavit and financial application, the Court finds that requiring Plaintiff to pay the filing fee for this case would likely interfere with the necessities of life. See Bryant v. Whalen, No. 88cv4834, 1992 WL 198946, 5 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 12, 1992). The Clerk's Office is directed to "filed" stamp plaintiff's complaint and issue summons for service by the U.S. Marshal Service. The U.S. Marshal is appointed to serve defendants. Plaintiff must complete and return to the Court a USM-285 form for each defendant being served if she has not already done so by 2/18/25. Plaintiff is referred to make an appointment at the Hibbler Pro Se Help Desk by following this link: https://hibbler-memorial-pro-se-assistance-program.appointlet.com or calling the Clerk's Office at 312-435-5670. A telephonic status hearing is set for 3/20/25 at 9:45AM. Attorneys/parties may appear by dialing: 1-650-479-3207 and entering access code: 2311 499 1046. No attendee code is required. Please review in advance the policies governing telephonic hearings that can be found on Judge Hunt's webpage on the court website. Mailed notice (gel,) |
| 5 | 2025-01-23 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Self-represented Plaintiff's Kimyuna K. Jackson's application to proceed without prepaying fees or costs [10] is set for telephonic hearing on 1/28/25 at 9:45AM. Attorneys/parties may appear by dialing: 1-650-479-3207 and entering access code: 2311 499 1046. No attendee code is required. Please review in advance the policies governing telephonic hearings that can be found on Judge Hunt's webpage on the court website. Mailed notice (gel,) |
| 4 | 2025-01-17 | APPLICATION by Plaintiff Kimyuna K. Jackson for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Received at the Intake Counter on 1/17/2025) |
| 3 | 2025-01-08 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Self-represented Plaintiff Kimyuna K. Jackson's In Forma Pauperis Application [5] is denied without prejudice. As an initial matter, Plaintiff did not use the court-approved IFP application form, and the form that she did use does not provide all the information necessary to fully evaluate the request. Additionally, Plaintiff reports that, in the last 12 months, she received $4,019.00 for disability income from the Department of Veterans Affairs. However, based on the information Plaintiff provided and the Court's understanding of VA disability income, the Court presumes that Plaintiff actually receives this amount each month. See U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VA Disability Compensation, https://www.va.gov/disability/ (last visited 1/7/25) ("VA disability compensation (pay) offers a monthly tax-free payment to Veterans who got sick or injured while serving in the military"). "To qualify for IFP status, a plaintiff must fully disclose her financial condition, and she must do so truthfully under penalty of perjury." Effinger v. Monterrey Sec. Consultants, 546 F. Supp. 3d 715, 717 (N.D. Ill. 2021). To proceed with this case, by 2/6/25, Plaintiff must either (1) pay the filing fee in full; or (2) file a new in forma pauperis application that accurately discloses her financial condition using the court-approved form, which is available at https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/_assets/_documents/_forms/_online/IFP_nonPrisoner.pdf. Failure to do so will result in the case being dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel [6] is also denied without prejudice, as Plaintiff has not made any attempt to obtain counsel on her own. See Pickett v. Chi. Transit Auth., 930 F.3d 869, 871 (7th Cir. 2019) ("A litigant's good faith but unsuccessful effort to obtain counsel is a necessary condition to the provision of judicial assistance to recruit a lawyer."). Mailed notice (gel,) |
| 2 | 2025-01-06 | APPLICATION by Plaintiff Kimyuna K. Jackson for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Received via Intake counter 1/6/25) |
| 1 | 2025-01-06 | MOTION by Plaintiff Kimyuna K. Jackson for attorney representation. (Received via Intake counter 1/6/25) |
