Makiko Kimura v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
最近更新时间：2025-06-26
案件信息
案件号：ilnd-1:2025-cv-01871
状态：open
提交时间：2025-04-10 00:00:00
诉讼类型：
律所：
原告：Makiko Kimura v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
| # | 日期 | 案件进程 |
| 61 | 2025-04-10 | MAILED the surety bond, docket entry 22 in the amount of $10,000.00, posted by Makiko Kimura, to Keith A. Vogt, Keith Vogt, Ltd., 33 West Jackson Boulevard, Unit #2W, Chicago, IL 60604 via certified mail article number 7022 3330 0001 8849 4936. |
| 60 | 2025-04-10 | MAILED the surety bond, docket entry [22] in the amount of $10,000.00, posted by Makiko Kimura, to Keith A. Vogt, Keith Vogt, Ltd., 33 West Jackson Boulevard, Unit #2W, Chicago, IL 60604 via certified mail article number 7022 3330 0001 8849 4936. |
| 59 | 2025-04-09 | SATISFACTION of Judgment as to defendant no. 72 YIXUAN SCRAPBOOKING US |
| 58 | 2025-04-09 | ENTERED FINAL DEFAULT JUDGMENT ORDER Signed by the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins on 4/9/2025. Mailed notice. |
| 57 | 2025-04-09 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: No remaining Defendant has responded to Plaintiff's motion for entry of default judgment. Accordingly, the motion [35] is granted. Based on the evidence previously submitted by Plaintiff and the admission of liability by virtue of the default, Plaintiff has established that a permanent injunction should be entered. The Clerk is directed to return the surety bond posted. Enter Final Judgment Order. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. |
| 56 | 2025-04-08 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by All Plaintiffs as to [certain] defendants |
| 55 | 2025-04-01 | CERTIFICATE of Service by Plaintiff Makiko Kimura regarding order on motion for default judgment, text entry, [37] |
| 54 | 2025-04-01 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion [35] for entry of default and default judgment against all Defendants. All remaining defendants have failed either to plead or to otherwise appear to defend against this action. Accordingly, default is entered under Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Any objections to the motion for entry of default judgment must be filed on or before April 7, 2025. If no objections are filed by that date, the court will consider the motion unopposed. The Court will also rule on the papers unless a hearing is requested by April 3, 2025. A hearing may be requested by filing a Request for Hearing as a separate entry on the docket. Plaintiff must serve this minute order upon all remaining Defendants within one business day of its entry on the docket and must promptly file proof of that service, Mailed notice. |
| 53 | 2025-03-31 | Declaration of Keith A. Vogt |
| 52 | 2025-03-31 | Exhibit 2 |
| 51 | 2025-03-31 | Exhibit 1 |
| 50 | 2025-03-31 | MEMORANDUM by Makiko Kimura in support of motion for default judgment[35] |
| 49 | 2025-03-31 | MOTION by Plaintiff Makiko Kimura for default judgment as to the Defendants Identified in First Amended Schedule A |
| 48 | 2025-03-30 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by All Plaintiffs as to [certain] defendants |
| 47 | 2025-03-26 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Defendant Arkrt's unopposed motion for an extension of time [32] is granted. This Defendant's answer is due by April 18, 2025. Mailed notice. |
| 46 | 2025-03-25 | MOTION by Defendant ARKRT for extension of time to file answer (Unopposed) |
| 45 | 2025-03-14 | PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Order Signed by the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins on 3/14/2025. Mailed notice. |
| 44 | 2025-03-14 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction [23] is granted. Plaintiff's filings establish that it has acted expeditiously to protect its interests and that there remains a significant risk Defendants will transfer relevant assets beyond the Court's reach. For these reasons, as well as the reasons provided in the whole of Plaintiff's filings and as stated by the Court in connection with entry of the TRO, the Court is persuaded that Plaintiff has satisfied the requirements for a preliminary injunction. In addition, the Court finds that the balance of harms favors Plaintiff and that a preliminary injunction serves the public interest by, among other things, protecting consumers from the marketing of counterfeit goods. Plaintiff has also certified and established [27] that it provided electronic notice to defendants of the pendency of this case and provided a link to a website containing relevant case documents, but no objection to the motion for a preliminary injunction has been filed on behalf of any defendant. Enter preliminary injunction order. The Clerk shall unseal any documents that are sealed. The Law Firm of Jiangip Llc, is ordered to add ALL defendant names listed in the Schedule A to the docket within five business days, instructions can be found on the Court's website at https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/_assets/_documents/_forms/_cmecf/pdfs/v60/Add_Terminate_Instructions.pdf. Mailed notice. |
| 43 | 2025-03-10 | CERTIFICATE of Service by Plaintiff Makiko Kimura regarding order on motion for preliminary injunction, text entry, 26 |
| 42 | 2025-03-10 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion 23 for entry of a preliminary injunction. In connection with that motion, Plaintiff must serve all remaining Defendants with the following statement: "The Court has taken the motion for a preliminary injunction under advisement and will consider the motion unopposed if no Defendant appears and objects by March 13, 2025." If no objections are filed by that date, the Court will consider the motion unopposed. Plaintiff must serve this minute order upon all remaining Defendants within one business day of its entry on the docket and must promptly file proof of that service. For the reasons stated in the Court's orders entering the TRO, the TRO is extended until the Court adjudicates the motion for a preliminary injunction. See H-D Mich., LLC v. Hellenic Duty Free Shops S.A., 694 F.3d 827, 843-45 (7th Cir. 2012). Because this extension exceeds the maximum duration for a TRO under FRCP 65(b), this extension "becomes in effect a preliminary injunction that is appealable, but the order remains effective." Id. at 844. Mailed notice. |
| 41 | 2025-03-07 | (Declaration of Service) |
| 40 | 2025-03-07 | SUMMONS Returned Executed by Makiko Kimura as to The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A on 3/7/2025, answer due 3/28/2025. |
| 39 | 2025-03-07 | (Exhibit 1, of Keith A. Vogt's Declaration) |
| 38 | 2025-03-07 | Declaration of Keith A. Vogt |
| 37 | 2025-03-07 | MEMORANDUM by Makiko Kimura in support of motion for preliminary injunction 23 |
| 36 | 2025-03-07 | MOTION by Plaintiff Makiko Kimura for preliminary injunction |
| 35 | 2025-03-03 | SURETY BOND in the amount of $ 10,000.00 posted by Makiko Kimura |
| 34 | 2025-03-03 | SUMMONS Issued (Court Participant) as to Defendant The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A |
| 33 | 2025-02-27 | Exhibit 2-5 |
| 32 | 2025-02-27 | (Exhibit 2-7) |
| 31 | 2025-02-27 | Exhibit 2-6 |
| 30 | 2025-02-27 | Exhibit 2-4 |
| 29 | 2025-02-27 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Makiko Kimura Schedule A Template Schedule of Defendants to the Complaint 1 and Schedule A 2 |
| 28 | 2025-02-27 | MOTION by Plaintiff Makiko Kimura for leave to file under seal |
| 27 | 2025-02-27 | MOTION by Plaintiff Makiko Kimura for leave to file excess pages |
| 26 | 2025-02-27 | MEMORANDUM in Support of 15 Exparte Motion |
| 25 | 2025-02-27 | Declaration of Keith A. Vogt |
| 24 | 2025-02-27 | Exhibit 1-4, of Keith A. Vogt's Declaration |
| 23 | 2025-02-27 | Declaration of Makiko Kimura |
| 22 | 2025-02-27 | (Exhibit 1, of Makiko Kimura's Declaration) |
| 21 | 2025-02-27 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Makiko Kimura Sealed Exhibit 2, Declaration of Makiko Kimura regarding memorandum in support of motion, 16 |
| 20 | 2025-02-27 | Exhibit 2-1 |
| 19 | 2025-02-27 | Exhibit 2-2 |
| 18 | 2025-02-27 | Exhibit 2-3 |
| 17 | 2025-02-25 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Plaintiff should review the Court's standing order on "Schedule A" Cases, available at https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/judge-info.aspx?IuUaWzNcEoPr4PHl9tvcGaMUezk8AnJ1 under the "Case Procedures" tab. As explained there, Plaintiff must complete and file the template linked on that page before the Court will consider granting any motion for preliminary injunctive relief. The submission must also provide a listing of all prior Schedule A cases filed in any court in the United States in which Plaintiff was a plaintiff, and a listing of any of the defendants included in the Schedule A in this case that Plaintiff has previously named as a defendant in any prior complaint or Schedule A case. Finally, by filing the template, Plaintiff certifies that Plaintiff has not used any of the screenshot evidence supplied in support of a motion for a TRO in this case in any prior proceeding. If the template is not completed by March 4, 2025, the Court may dismiss this matter for failure to prosecute. Mailed notice. |
| 16 | 2025-02-24 | Exhibit 1 |
| 15 | 2025-02-24 | COMPLAINT filed by Makiko Kimura; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23120906. |
| 14 | 2025-02-24 | Exhibit 2 |
| 13 | 2025-02-24 | Exhibit 3 |
| 12 | 2025-02-24 | (Exhibit) |
| 11 | 2025-02-24 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Makiko Kimura Schedule A to Complaint 1 |
| 10 | 2025-02-24 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 9 | 2025-02-24 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Makiko Kimura by Keith A. Vogt |
| 8 | 2025-02-24 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Makiko Kimura by Adam Grodman |
| 7 | 2025-02-24 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Makiko Kimura by Cameron Eugene Mcintyre |
| 6 | 2025-02-24 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Makiko Kimura by Christopher Romero |
| 5 | 2025-02-24 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Makiko Kimura by Monica Rita Martin |
| 4 | 2025-02-24 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Makiko Kimura by Yanling Jiang |
| 3 | 2025-02-24 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Makiko Kimura by Yi Bu |
| 2 | 2025-02-24 | CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3). |
| 1 | 2025-02-24 | CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. |
