Rekas v. Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
最近更新时间：2025-06-26
案件信息
案件号：ilnd-1:2025-cv-01876
状态：open
提交时间：2025-05-20 00:00:00
诉讼类型：
律所：
原告：Rekas v. Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
| # | 日期 | 案件进程 |
| 22 | 2025-05-20 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Rekas of all defendants |
| 21 | 2025-03-31 | MEMORANDUM by Rekas in support of motion for temporary restraining order 8 |
| 20 | 2025-03-31 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Plaintiff is reminded that this case is stayed pursuant to the Court's order at Docket Entry 7. Mailed notice. |
| 19 | 2025-03-31 | MOTION by Plaintiff Rekas to seal document sealed document 10 |
| 18 | 2025-03-31 | MOTION by Plaintiff Rekas for leave to file excess pages |
| 17 | 2025-03-31 | (Exhibit Exhibit 2 (Part 3 of 3)) |
| 16 | 2025-03-31 | Exhibit Exhibit 2 (Part 2 of 3) |
| 15 | 2025-03-31 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Rekas Exhibit 2 to Declaration of Plaintiff |
| 14 | 2025-03-31 | (Exhibit Exhibit 1) |
| 13 | 2025-03-31 | Declaration Declaration of Plaintiff |
| 12 | 2025-03-31 | Declaration Declaration of David Gulbransen |
| 11 | 2025-03-31 | MOTION by Plaintiff Rekas for temporary restraining order |
| 10 | 2025-03-27 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: On the Court's initiative, all pending motions are held in abeyance, and the case is stayed pending further order. This stay, which the Court is entering in other so-called "Schedule A" cases on its docket where requests for temporary restraining orders remain pending, is intended to permit the Court the opportunity to reassess its previous approach in Schedule A litigation involving Lanham Act, Copyright Act, and Patent Act claims typically brought on an ex parte basis against various online merchants. This reassessment will consider, among other things, whether: (1) ex parte proceedings are appropriate in these types of cases; (2) the routine sealing of parts or all of the docket is appropriate; (3) the routine granting of temporary restraining orders on an ex parte basis is a sound exercise of judicial discretion; (4) the routine granting of prejudgment asset restraints is a sound exercise of judicial discretion; and (5) the mass joinder of defendants is appropriate under the circumstances typically present in Schedule A cases. Plaintiff remains free, of course, to dismiss this action voluntarily if they wish to pursue their claims in another District, but no supplemental briefing on the pending motions may be filed absent advance leave of Court. Mailed notice. |
| 9 | 2025-02-25 | CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. |
| 8 | 2025-02-25 | CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John F. Kness. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3). |
| 7 | 2025-02-25 | MAILED copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC. |
| 6 | 2025-02-24 | COMPLAINT filed by Rekas; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23124910. |
| 5 | 2025-02-24 | MOTION by Plaintiff Rekas to seal document sealed document[2] |
| 4 | 2025-02-24 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Rekas by David Lee Gulbransen, Jr |
| 3 | 2025-02-24 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 2 | 2025-02-24 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Rekas Schedule A to Complaint |
| 1 | 2025-02-24 | Exhibit Exhibit 1 |
